If you ever want to restore your faith in humanity and bolster your hopefulness that we have the capacity to create an environment of true inclusion and respect, then do yourself a favor and get thee to the next ICI Summer Institute. Many of the offerings of Syracuse University's Institute for Communication and Inclusion are probably equally worthwhile, but since we've just returned from the 3 day Summer Institute, that's what I want to tell you about. The experience of being part of this gathering was profoundly moving.
For three days, Oliver and I were among nearly 300 other
people coming together to talk about how to better support individuals who
communicate primarily through typing. As I wrote in an earlier post, I was
maybe like some of you reading this, skeptical about the whole concept of
supported typing. And maybe if Oliver hadn’t shown me the way last year as we
worked it out on our own with handwriting, I might never have looked at
facilitated communication seriously as something worth exploring. What we did
together was organic and intuitive if incredibly low-tech. But it was clear
that Oliver would need to type if he ever wanted to communicate and be
understood by a broader audience. At
home I quickly realized that typing would not, at first, follow the same
organic, intuitive path by which handwriting unfolded for us. By the time we
arrived in Syracuse, we were ready to embrace whatever support we could find
amid a group of people who have spent their lives helping people like Oliver to
achieve their full potential through communication and from the many, many
individuals who have found a way to make themselves heard despite the inability
to speak. I came with an open mind and I left with a grounding in a specific
set of skills based on widely accepted teaching philosophies and an enormous
respect for everyone I met.
Presuming the competence of all individuals to be
intelligent and to be capable in determining the course of their own lives is not
just an idea, it is a fast-held belief and constant practice for the people I
met in Syracuse. The most profoundly moving part of the three-day experience
for me was to be surrounded by professionals and parents who treated those
individuals with disabilities that they supported with respect and the
presumption of competence. You might ask what I found so moving about actions
that most probably agree is the standard for how we should treat all people without
question or regard for ability. Who among us thinks there is an exception to
the Golden Rule? But the truth is that it is too easy to treat someone in a
manner consistent with our assumptions based on nothing more than that person’s
appearance and behavior.
I know this to be true because (and here is my first shameful
confession) I am as guilty of it as anyone. Before Oliver gave me a reason to
question the assumptions I formed about people with disabilities I’m sure that
without any real consideration, I assumed that if a person could not speak or
if they behaved in a way that I didn’t understand, that they somehow innately lacked
the ability to express themselves in an equal and reciprocal way. In short, I
didn’t expect much of them. And further,
because of my assumptions I was so
uncomfortable about my inability to interact in a way that was prescribed by social norms that I
never spent the time trying to consider that other person at all. Ironically, the impairment was all mine, because if
it had occurred to me that the solution was simply a matter of presuming
competence, then I would have had a basis for embracing my role in the
social interaction as I would with any other person I meet. Had I done this, my discomfort is likely to have evaporated,
opening a whole world of possibilities for friendship and growth.
Parenting Oliver gave me a sharply distasteful dose of what
it feels like to be on the receiving end of this kind of thinking. Or perhaps I
should call it non-thinking. No words of assurance from me would convince
people – doctors, teachers, therapists, friends, family -- to abandon whatever
assumptions they made about Oliver’s intelligence based on his behavior or
performance. In all the years of his life, I can think of hardly anyone who
treated him with the presumption of competence. I was very lucky, in that one
of the very first books I read after Oliver was diagnosed was Douglas Biklen’s:
Autism and the Myth of the Person Alone. Although there were a lot of ideas
competing for my attention in that first year of knowledge building, the idea
of Presuming Competence that is the basis for this book, thankfully, stuck with
me throughout.
And yet. …
A funny thing happened in March 2011. Over the course of
just a few short days Oliver demonstrated to us that he could read and write
and communicate to a much higher degree than we imagined. My second shameful
confession of this post is to admit that, although I had always believed in
Oliver, during that period the way we treated Oliver changed virtually
overnight. Let me say that again: even though I thought I was parenting from a
place of presuming competence, the way we treated Oliver changed once he
demonstrated his abilities in a way that we valued. Oliver was the same kid
he always was but the subtle shift in our behavior was noticeable enough that
it became a frequent topic of late night conversation and self-flagellation for both Nik and me. Our assumptions about what Oliver was
processing, thinking and feeling turned out to be inadequate and misleading.
Oliver is now typing every day. He is telling us his
thoughts (sometimes not always what we want to hear) and helping us better
understand what kind of support he needs and it is getting easier for both of
us. He now has an e-mail buddy – another boy of the same age who types. And I
have connected with other parents who have had the same experience watching
their non-speaking child of varying ages finally find their voice. I was
surprised to find just how many of us there are out there.
I can’t tell you if the people we met in Syracuse were any
better at presuming competence from the beginning than we were. But each and
every one of them is a role model for me as I continue on this journey with my
son.
What an incredible experience - both the conference and your unfolding relationship with your son. When I read of your post, I thought of the way people presume others who speak English less fluently are less competent; it also reminded me of the way that hospital professionals presumed a lack of competence in new parents and how those early interactions (after giving birth) really affected one's confidence in parenting. Thank you for your thoughtful posts.
ReplyDelete